Tuesday, January 29, 2013

If Obama requiring military leaders to agree to fire on US citizens?

Read more here. The story goes on to describe the McKinnon County War for control of the ballot boxes.
According to Examiner.com, renowned author and humanitarian Dr. Jim Garrow made an outrageous statement in the following Facebook post:
I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.” Those who will not are being removed.
ObamaLitmusTest450x285Maybe true, maybe not, but it does bring up an important point about the anti-gun protests. The protesters claim that you don’t need an assault weapon for hunting, but who said that the 2nd Amendment was only about hunters’ rights?  It’s not, it’s about gun rights. The anti-gun crowd held signs stating that only the military should have assault weapons. However, the right of every citizen to protect themselves from tyranny is the main thrust of the 2nd Amendment.
So maybe the Examiner.com story is a conspiracy theory, but that doesn’t mean that the need for citizens to pick up the guns in the face of government corruption never happened in this country. It did, and I am not talking about the British either.

6 comments:

Woodsterman (Odie) said...

Never trust a liberal. Especially the ones who say they only want what's best for you.

LL said...

That may be true. General Dempsey (Chairman JCS) and many of the senior military leaders are being vetted based up on their liberal leanings.

PROGRESSIVE - Promoted

CONSERVATIVES - Encouraged to Retire (thanks for your opinion)

However there are a lot of hunters out there with bolt action firearms (not subject to ban) who don't want to own one of the so-called 'assault weapons'.

The problem that the ObamaNation faces is that most of those sharp shooters with scoped .270's and such know how to 'harvest' an assault weapon from a government person (or their bodyguard), complete with ammunition, should they want one.

Paladin said...

The main thrust of the 2nd amendment isn't protection from tyranny. It's the ONLY thrust of the second amendment.

Nate said...

Conspiracy theory or not, I wouldn't put it past him.

Old NFO said...

+1 on LL... sigh Those that drink the koolaid get promoted!

The Conservative Lady said...

It would not surprise me if this is true.