Now THAT'S what I'm talkin' about! Go girl!
If you turn her around, there is a LOT of junk on the bunk.When I see that photo, I think 'attention whore'.
All she needs are fangs to complete that whole Vampirella thing.Spooky, but hot.
Her plastic surgeon would be proud!LL, you only need to use the "second word"!Thanks for the linkage, I'll have to do a rule 5 for my next post, I've been slacking off ;-)
I think that 'whore' may be a harsh use of words unless you slap "attention" in front of it. I'm sure that there are no direct cash-for-sex transactions involved in her life. HOWEVER to the extent that sex draw media attention and the slavering of pubescent boys - she's up for the role.
Her breasts, they are so large, they frighten and confuse me!
Robert, I recall seeing a PBS special on sex that explained that breast cleavage evolved as a "frontal display" which is supposed to remind the opposite sex of the, er, rear display and the cleavage, er, down there.
I would say it's just right for anywhere!
No thanks. The same thing she'd say if offered time with WoFat.
I will preface this comment by admitting that I couldn't wear that outfit, but I wouldn't want to, and don't quite understand why someone would.
Not my type. And I don't think anyone is too sexy for anything.
Meh. All I see is an expensive boob job and too much lipstick. The twisted rubber band is not flattering and the photography's beyond mediocre.This is yet another reason not to follow Kim on Twitter.
she does nothing for me. I find her trashy not classy
Isn't her eye makeup a bit obvious?
And you want this Old West Pac hand to answer this?She is absolutely gorgeous!
Why is the right wing so fascinated by this bimbo?
White nail polish seems to ruin the look. lol.
Ducky, oh, I don't know. But as you bring it up, why are you here. You rarely if ever visit and comment. Why did you choose this post?The rule 5 thing is supposed to bring increased traffic (you) and change things up from the political fare. And even if it is to look at a social trainwreck and sit collectively and shake our heads (not necessarily Kim I'm talking about here) that is also a valid function of a rule 5 post.Anyway, thanks for the visit. Any troll of Z's is a troll of mine. :-)
I think your label "there she Stands" needs to be also put under Kim's picture. I chocke on my coco puff when U saw her pic.
I have to comment on this one, my question (comment) is, can she even afford twitter after all the money she's spent on looking like what LL said?
LL: she's got a lot in the back to counterbalance what she's got in the front - otherwise she'd be face-planting every time she tried to walk.
I've got you linked up on a Rule 5 roundup: 'Britney Spears — 'Hold It Against Me' — Rule 5'.
Her boobs are too big in my opinion. Some men may have a hard time finding her face.
Sexy is in the soul, then exhibits in the flesh. She has it backwards and will never attain, save for the jaded users who care nothing. She is more akin to a used cigarette butt than a beautiful woman. There is, however, always hope.
Mixed bag of comments here! But I thank you for the linky love and have double linked you in my "Love is in the Air" post! Luved the Kitteh Pair better, hee hee ;-)
her dad was a really good friend and her aunt's a friend...it kills me to see these girls like this..it really does.
Sorry, she's just plain disgusting, regardless of the packaging.
Post a Comment