Thursday, October 7, 2010

Government Agents Seize Oathkeeper's Newborn From Hospital?

OMGosh, can it be true?

Stephanie Janvrin's facebook page.
Official Oathkeepers' Statement:
We are doing all we can to confirm and document this. But if is IS accurate, and a newborn child was ripped from her mother's arms because the parents were "associated" with Oath Keepers by simply being members of our online ning discussion forum, then this is a grave crossing of a very serious line, and is utterly intolerable. It cannot be done. It cannot be allowed to stand.

If it is true, then I will do all in my power to stop it. We will pull out all the stops, every lawful means of seeing that this child is returned to her parents and that all persons responsible are held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. There can be no freedom of speech, no freedom of association, no freedom to even open your mouth and "speak truth to power," no freedom AT ALL, if your children can be black bagged and stolen from you because of your political speech and associations - because you simply dare to express your love of country, and dare to express your solidarity and fellowship with other citizens and with active duty and retired military and police who simply pledge to honor their oath and obey the Constitution. It was to prevent just such outrageous content based persecution of political dissidents that our First Amendment was written.

picture from her facebook page
If true, then this is as bad, and in fact worse, than any of the violations of liberty that our Declaration of Independence lists as the reasons for our forefathers taking up arms in our Revolution and for separating from England. We no longer have freedom at all if this is allowed to be done. And we will not let it stand.

Stewart Rhodes Founder of Oath Keepers

Stewart will post additional statements and info as this situation develops. Please be ready to flood the responsible parties with phone calls and emails to put public pressure on them in the court of public opinion.
My question is, what did the mother do to justify removal of her baby. Even if the father had "issues", what did she do. Why was the baby removed from her as well.

8 comments:

Nickie Goomba said...

I'm stunned. I expect the MSM to be all over this. (sigh)

madmath1 said...

Wow, the Nazi's have returned.

Doom said...

If this is true the NAZI's are about to have a SHHR (sudden harsh history review). This will be war and we will not lose. Forget about my doubts about the Senate as well. As much as I would hate to think this is true, I actually hope it is. The world will have just changed.

Woodsterman (Odie) said...

A judge signed this order? The mother and baby must be guilty by association. If I have my facts straight, this man basically swore to uphold the Constitution. Here it comes ... the war within "Chicago Style".

Necromancer said...

Here is some info on Oathbreakers of which I am a member. There are over 300 comments and it's growing.

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/10/07/oath-keepers-statement-about-video-titled-government-agents-seize-oath-keepers-new-born-from-hospital/

Red said...

Is this for real??

Doom said...

I check in for updates where you offer and look for the story elsewhere. I have found one report, so far, and thought to share it.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=213149

Sorry, forgot how to embed. I would guess the other news outlets and bloggers are... reviewing... before jumping in. This is very provocative... dangerous... in many ways.

The_Kid said...

Are they sure it's political? Pure evil in any case.